rynet_ii: VY2 sits at a desk writing while love letters fly around him. (I probably wrote something.)
Every time someone found out about her relationship with Starscream, their response was always one of bafflement. Why, they would wonder, didn’t Arcee pick someone exceptional, someone who could match her for strength, drive, and loyalty?

Arcee’s response was simply: “I did.”


* * *

Occasionally Decepticons former and present would find out about his relationship with Arcee, and their response was always one of bafflement. How is it, they would wonder, that the Decepticon commander who had never showed any interest in matters of the spark, or indeed anything but obtaining more power and prestige, had wound up romantically involved with a sharp-tongued Autobot two-wheeler?

Starscream’s response was usually: “How dare you question a superior officer!”
rynet_ii: VY2 sits at a desk writing while love letters fly around him. (I probably wrote something.)

So I finally went to the library and checked out a random history book called Historical Enigmas, by Hugh Ross Williamson.

I have so far read the “epistle dedicatory,” the foreward, and the first two chapters. Despite the premise of the book being unsolved mysteries from history (mostly Western European history iirc), the majority of what I’ve read so far has been Hugh Ross Williamson’s theories on how history as a subject should be approached.

The gist is that he views history as more of an art than a science, and is contemptuous of his contemporaries (1950s-1970s) who approach it as a science. (”It must be a ‘science’; it must have a ‘method’; it must flourish ‘facts’; it must announce ‘conclusions’.” Hugh Ross Williamson states bitterly.)

Hugh Ross Williamson is also a believer in the Great Man theory, or at least that studying history with a focus on the various Great Men is going to give you a better understanding of history “than by analysing the life of a seaport community in the year 1588.”

I don’t disagree with all of the various points he makes, many of which I haven’t gone into here, but his general phrasing and the way he makes himself out to be this bold, rule-breaking historian detective who’s unfairly treated by the Oxford establishment that disagrees with his methods even though they’re so much better than theirs, makes me think Hugh Ross Williamson is kind of a pompous windbag.

(And because that particular phrase popped into my head I picture him as looking like this guy.) 

Profile

rynet_ii: A deoxys (alien-like pokemon) with a neutral expression. (Default)
Rosie

July 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 22nd, 2017 06:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios